The Platform

One platform. Seven suites. 34 products.

Every product is purpose-built for semiconductors and runs read-first over your ERP, MES, PLM and EDA estate — agents recommend, deterministic engines set the numbers, a named human approves every write.

0purpose-built products
0suites, one decision spine
Weeksto first value — read-first
Cite or abstainevery claim carries evidence
  • AI never writes to SAP or MES without a gate
  • Deterministic engines set the numbers
  • Named-human approval on every action

Engineering AI

5 products

From design intent to installed capability — without the knowledge tax.

For CTOs, VPs Engineering, fab program directors and design-ops leaders.

Monday 08:00

Reviews dispositioned and clause-cited overnight, every change’s blast radius computed — no answer trapped in a veteran’s head.

One knowledge-graph spine for fab design and construction — every tool linked to its POCs, utilities, standards, documents and decisions, with AI agents on every gate, plus release↔PO↔need-date build alignment. Read-first over your BIM/CDE estate; write-back only via named-engineer approval.

Capabilities

100%-coverage design review, clause-cited (ISO 14644, SEMI S2/S8) Change blast radius: 47 objects traced in 4 min Clash triage: 2,412 hits → 41 root-cause issues Generative ballroom & sub-fab routing — weeks → hours 36,000+ pages of tool specs → structured POC records

Outcomes

2–4 wks → 24–48 hper design-review pass, at 100% coverage
$44M–$365Mprogram value on one $10B fab (est.)
~13–70xROI vs 3-year platform cost (est.)
$50–65Mvalue of one month of earlier ramp
Mode Build & Schedule Alignment ← absorbs Fab Build AI

Extends the same graph to construction: fab-build orders long-lead packages while the design is still moving, and each month of slip carries $30–130M. Live-links engineering release ↔ PO ↔ site-need date per package and turns divergence into ranked, gated recommendations.

Three-way linkage per package: release ↔ PO ↔ need date 5 misalignment classes, detected deterministically Ranked by $ exposure × critical-path float consumed Bounded resequence what-ifs — “what slips if switchgear moves 3 weeks?” Evidence chain: drawing rev → ECN → PO line → activity
$30–130Mcost of one month of fab-build slip — the wedge
~2 wkscritical-path float recovered per quarter — $25–65M
0writes to P6/SAP/CDE — owners execute, gates approve
Also integratesCDE (ACC/Procore)SAP MM/PS
Entry point: a slip month ≈ $30–130M
IntegratesAutodesk APS/ACCProjectWiseTeamcenter PLMSAP/Oracle ERPPrimavera P6
Built on Owllys FabNest (+ M18 BuildSync) foundation Workflow: Equipment installation →

Design ops runs at maturity ~2/5 even here: verification eats 60–70% of effort, EDA license spend is a black box, tapeout slips surface late. A telemetry-and-agents layer over your own exhaust — regression logs, coverage, license servers, Jira.

Capabilities

Regression triage: failures clustered, root-caused, bugs drafted Coverage analytics + test-plan copilot EDA license optimizer: idle seats and contention priced Tapeout slip early-warning, while still recoverable IP-reuse semantic search that actually finds things

Outcomes

60–70%the verification share of design effort this attacks
Hard dollarsEDA license spend reduced via utilization analytics
Caught earlytapeout slips flagged while recoverable
Hours returnedregression-triage engineer time — direct P&L
IntegratesEDA license serversRegression/coverage DBsJiraGit/Perforce
Built on Owllys Design Ops Intelligence foundation Workflow: Engineering change →

Standards and process windows treated as executable, not archival: recipes, SPC limits and operating states checked continuously against the current design and running fab. Simulation becomes governed evidence — every run pinned to its revision, stale results flagged.

Capabilities

300+ executable rules: PASS / FAIL / NEEDS-REVIEW, clause-cited Operational-state simulation before certification Solver orchestration over your CFD, vibration, energy stack ML surrogates answer in seconds, not days Delta re-checks: a change re-triggers only affected checks

Outcomes

Seconds vs dayssurrogate estimates vs full solver runs
1–3x, not 21–78xcost of error discovery, moved left (NASA curve)
Caught at designthe at-rest-pass / operational-fail mode
300+executable rules at first release
IntegratesANSYS/OpenFOAM/TecnomatixMES/FDCStandards librariesBIM/IFC
Built on Owllys FabNest process modules foundation Workflow: Yield improvement →

Thousands of PCN/EOL notices a year, each traced by hand while 90–180-day last-time-buy windows close. Every notice is parsed and resolved against your BOM and qualification graph — blast radius across products, quals, WIP and customers, tuned for recall.

Capabilities

Every notice parsed to a typed schema (email, portals, aggregators) Impact traced: BOM → products → quals → WIP → customers Last-time-buy optimizer under demand uncertainty Gated response drafts + re-qualification triggers Your own ECOs trace the same graph outward

Outcomes

Days → minutesimpact analysis per change notice
0last-time-buy windows missed
→ ~0quality escapes from unmanaged change
Thousands/yrnotices absorbed without added headcount
IntegratesSAP/Oracle ERPPLMSiliconExpert/Z2DataEmail/portals
Built on Owllys PCN/ECN Intelligence foundation Workflow: Engineering change →

Greenfield plants hire thousands of freshers while the answer to “bonder error E-412 on QFN-48” lives in a veteran’s head. SOPs, travelers, MES/FDC history, e-logbooks and per-serial tool docs become grounded answers — every one cited, or it abstains.

Capabilities

Work-instruction Q&A with citations, multilingual Shift-handover drafts from MES/FDC events + e-logbook Deviation assistant: likely causes from similar past NCRs Operator tutor over your procedures, competence gaps tracked

Outcomes

100%answers cited or abstained — zero-hallucination gate
Weeksto deploy, read-first on documents + MES
Downoperator time-to-competence; handover completeness up
Module Equipment corpus ← absorbs Equipment Docs AI

The same cite-or-abstain corpus, extended to the equipment estate: the versioned, permissioned document-of-record per tool model and serial — manuals, E6 specs, S2 dossiers, FAT/SAT records. It stays the citable spine that Field Service, Assembly and Commissioning read.

Per-serial document-of-record spine — linked and versioned Semantic revision diffs: what changed, who it touches Structured SEMI E6 / S2 exports to fabs
15+ min → secper engineering search on tool docs
≥90%retrieval-precision gate — one gate, both corpora
Also integratesPLM (Teamcenter/Windchill)SEMI E6
Stays the spine Field Service, Assembly & Commissioning cite
IntegratesMESFDCDocument storesE-logbooks
Built on Owllys Factory Knowledge Copilot (+ ToolVault) foundation Workflow: Root-cause investigation →

Manufacturing AI

4 products

Every lot, every tool, every shift — one live operating picture.

For COOs, VPs Manufacturing and fab & OSAT operations leadership.

Monday 08:00

WIP and OEE live per tool and shift, excursions ranked in dollars — a costed action minutes after every shock.

A fab operations command center over your MES and FDC estate: live WIP with predicted cycle times, OEE accounting, an excursion feed ranked by value-at-risk, and a scenario twin for the what-ifs. Read-first — every write passes a named-human gate.

Capabilities

Live WIP with ML cycle-time ETAs per route OEE & tool-state accounting — one state language Every disruption scored in currency-at-risk, owner assigned Scenario twin: shocks re-planned with costed deltas Gated dispatch writes — one audited MES field

Outcomes

Minutesdetection-to-action vs the ~2-week norm
Hoursto re-plan a shock — not a war room
Weeks of WIPhidden interface buffer recovered
IntegratesMES (Camstar/FactoryWorks)SECS/GEMFDCSAP ERP
Built on Owllys OpsNest foundation Workflow: Root-cause investigation →

A yield excursion is a seven-figure event — one 2019 excursion scrapped $550M of wafers in a quarter. Wafer-map perception feeds a self-building genealogy graph; agentic RCA runs cross-stage over MES, FDC and STDF — ranked hypotheses, every claim cited.

Capabilities

Genealogy graph built automatically — compounds with every lot Agentic RCA: ranked hypotheses with evidence trails Excursion feed with scrap-at-risk in dollars Gated lot disposition — the only MES write, audited Ask it: “why did bin-7 spike?” · “draft the 8D”

Outcomes

Days → hourstime-to-root-cause on excursions
$100k–$10M+per-excursion exposure addressed
100%claims evidence-cited
90 daystypical deployment
Mode Wafer-map + adaptive-test ← absorbs Inspection AI

The perception layer that feeds the genealogy graph — and a cheap entry tier: a CNN names every wafer-map signature (edge ring, scratch, donut) on arrival, and DPPM-guarded adaptive test-time reduction attacks the OSAT’s #1 margin lever, MES-write-free.

Wafer-map CNN signatures classified on arrival — the perception layer Adaptive test-time reduction, DPPM-guarded Sort + final-test (STDF) analytics into the genealogy graph Excursion linkage to tool & recipe
On arrivalsignatures named before a human opens the lot
$60–300k/yrOSAT/test-house entry tier — 90-day deploy, MES-write-free
Also integratesSort/probe systems
Entry tier: cheap OSAT / test-house wedge
IntegratesMESFDCSTDF testWAT/sort
Built on Owllys Yield & Quality Copilot (+ Wafer-Map & Test Analytics) foundation Workflow: Yield improvement →

OSAT margins run ~15–25% against foundry ~50%, yet thousands of package × test combinations are scheduled on Excel. A CP-SAT solver keeps a live horizon schedule; a sub-second dispatcher recommends the next lot. The planner approves; MES stays the record.

Capabilities

CP-SAT horizon solve on every WIP or tool event Sub-second next-lot-on-tool dispatch Hot-lot handling with ripple-cost analysis Hard guards: MSL clocks, due dates, tool capability Honest abstains on stale live state

Outcomes

−8–15%changeover-time reduction target
+2–5 ptstester/bonder OEE
<1 sdispatch latency
9.4%litho throughput lift (industry benchmark)
IntegratesMESSECS/GEM testers & bondersSAP ERP
Built on Owllys OSAT Scheduling AI foundation All eight industry workflows →

Calendar-based PM guards tools worth $5M–$380M each. FDC and sensor streams feed anomaly detection and remaining-useful-life estimates per failure mode — every alert an explicit economic decision, with the work order gated into SAP-PM.

Capabilities

Anomaly + RUL per critical subsystem, failure mode named Explicit economics: run-to-failure vs planned swap Predictive work orders gated into SAP-PM/CMMS Technician copilot — never invents a torque spec

Outcomes

−30–50%unplanned downtime (industry benchmark)
$5M–$380Mtool value idled per stockout — the stake
84% → 97%example spares fill-rate lift
IntegratesFDC/sensor streamsSAP PM/CMMSMES
Built on Owllys Spares & Maintenance Intelligence foundation Workflow: Fab maintenance →

Equipment AI

8 products

The full tool lifecycle — build, quote, install, service, resupply, trade.

For equipment OEM manufacturing, quoting, service, aftermarket and install leaders — fab equipment engineering, and the legacy-tool secondary market.

Monday 08:00

Fleet uptime vs the SLA floor, build promises vs factory reality, leakage found — every number drills to a ticket, PO or serial.

Robotic arm handling a wafer beside an equipment-automation HUD in a fab
equipment ai · build → install → service → resupply

Services run 22–35% of revenue at OEMs on tribal knowledge. Every ticket is triaged for remote resolution before a truck rolls; engineers get page-cited troubleshooting — plus an offline Engineer / 2 a.m. mode for legacy tools the OEM abandoned; every event is audited against entitlements.

Capabilities

Remote-first triage before the flight is booked Page-cited troubleshooting from manuals + closed tickets Dispatch prep: right skill, right parts kit Entitlement audit: free work and warranty misuse flagged

Outcomes

+50%first-contact resolution (industry benchmark)
30 min → <1 mintroubleshooting time per incident
~1 in 3tickets remotely resolvable — rolled anyway today
Per resolutionbilling — our revenue is your deflection rate
Mode Engineer / 2 a.m. Runner-ready ← absorbs Engineer AI

Troubleshooting for legacy tools the OEM abandoned: speak or photograph the symptom at the tool — offline — and get ranked fix cards cited to the page (the 1998 manual, this serial’s last three fixes). Runs on the shipped EquipAI substrate.

Voice/photo symptom intake — offline-capable at the tool Ranked fix cards, page-cited to scanned manuals + this serial’s history Legacy / OEM-abandoned-tool corpus, scanned pre-2005 manuals OCR’d Per-tenant knowledge flywheel: a veteran’s fix captured, curated, re-cited — never pooled Discontinued-part answers: alternates, repair or new-manufacture, priced (hands to Sales AI) Refurb-warranty entitlement leakage flagged, billable line drafted Per-verified-fix billing — a fix-verification gate meters revenue
symptom → <60 svoice/photo intake to a page-cited fix card
Per-tenantknowledge corpus, never pooled — your veterans stay your moat
Also integratesTicketing/TACScanned manuals (OCR)
Entry point: fab-owner / refurbisher wedge (PTW)
IntegratesFSM/ticketingEntitlements & contractsManuals/known-error KBCRM
Built on Owllys FieldNest + ToolVault (EquipAI substrate) foundation Workflow: Equipment servicing →

Remote health, predictive maintenance and a per-serial digital twin for the installed base. Five connectivity tiers feed drift baselines and RUL models; anomalies arrive as one approvable package. Raw telemetry never leaves the fab’s data boundary.

Capabilities

Five-tier connectivity: SECS/GEM → retrofit IoT SEMI E10/E79 state & OEE per serial Anomaly → cause, parts kit, dispatch, SLA — one approval object Per-serial twin + drift clustering across the fleet Fleet Q&A with citations

Outcomes

−30–50%unplanned downtime (industry benchmark)
+20–40%machine life
3–4 hoursunplanned downtime saved per planned hour
0competing installed-base twins for sale (verified Jul 2026)
IntegratesSECS/GEMInterface-AHistoriansRetrofit IoT
Built on Owllys FleetPulse + ToolTwin foundation Workflow: Equipment servicing →

First-pass yield on complex tool assemblies runs 85–90% — rework on machines priced $5M–$380M, while new-site ramps repeat the veterans’ apprenticeship. The traveler for a serial + configuration becomes interactive, cited, vision-verified steps at the clean bench.

Capabilities

Step cards per serial + config: action, spec values, citation chip Vision step-verify: fasteners, orientation, FOD, weld class Two-tap deviation → NCR draft + SME escalation BKM flywheel: floor fixes curated into the corpus Serial Build Record feeds FAT baselines and the tool twin

Outcomes

+2–5 ptsfirst-pass yield from the 85–90% baseline, measured
−30–50%time-to-solo for new technicians
100%steps cited — ships only after a ≥90% retrieval gate
≥10/mocurated BKMs entering the corpus by month 3
IntegratesSAP PPToolVault corpusVision/ML-serve
Built on Owllys Assembly Copilot (ToolVault + QualityIQ) foundation Workflow: Equipment installation →

SemAi schedules the fab — Tool Build AI schedules the people who build the tools. CP-SAT finite-capacity scheduling of engineer-to-order builds across clean bays, test stands and skill-certified crews, headless on your SAP: the solver proposes, the master scheduler publishes.

Capabilities

CP-SAT master schedule over bays × test stands × crew skills Build-slot promising: capable-to-promise ship dates, confidence-banded Recovery re-plans on a part or bay slip, ranked by promise-date delta Crew certification + export clearance as hard solver constraints Test-floor OEE analytics on 5-tier retrofit sensing

Outcomes

+2–5 ptsbay/test-stand OEE from the ~65–75% baseline (est.)
$5M–380Mthe shipment a recovered bay-week pulls forward
100%CP-SAT schedules constraint-valid — solver-verifiable
0writes to SAP PP — the master scheduler publishes
IntegratesSAP PP/MM (read-first)Test-floor edge sensingProcurement AI ETAsAssembly AI build actuals
Built on Owllys OpsNest for Equipment Makers (P9) foundation Workflow: Equipment installation →

Every configured-tool quote is an engineering exercise run from experts’ heads — and in a supercycle, quote latency is lost share. A CP-SAT rulebase decides validity, a deterministic engine prices the quote-to-BOM; the LLM drafts the narrative, never the numbers.

Capabilities

Option-compatibility rulebase — verdicts cited to the violated rule Quote-to-BOM integrity: valid config → priced BOM + margin/lead-time roll-up Export/ECCN pre-check per destination — calls Compliance AI, never rebuilds it Retrofit Radar: upgrade campaigns targeted by serial, not broadcast An ECO ripple invalidates affected open quotes automatically

Outcomes

Weeks → daysquote latency on complex configurations (est.)
21–78xinstall-stage cost of the config errors this prevents
0non-exportable configurations offered — 100% pre-screened
100%configurations constraint-valid, rule-cited
IntegratesCRM / SAP SD (releases)Serialized BOM (PLM)Compliance AITool Build AI CTP
Built on Owllys ConfigIQ (P11) foundation Workflow: Engineering change →

A fab installs ~1,200 tools from 100+ vendors; hook-up alone runs $200–500k per tool. Every order becomes one live thread — build → FAT → ship → hook-up → SAT → SL1–SL3 — with slip propagation and self-assembling dossiers.

Capabilities

One live thread from clean-bay build to SL sign-off Slip propagation with ranked recovery options Crew booking on skills + export-control constraints SL1–SL3 / SEMI S2 dossiers assemble themselves

Outcomes

≈ $12–16Mvalue of one avoided slip week (est.)
21–78xcost of an install-stage error vs design stage
$240–600Mhook-up scope per fab this protects
IntegratesPrimavera P6Shipment telemetryExport screeningQMS
Built on Owllys InstallNest foundation Workflow: Equipment installation →

Service-parts demand is intermittent and install-base-driven — the canonical hard forecasting problem, run today on ERP min/max. Forecasts come from fleet age, utilization and PM waves; the whole echelon is optimized with SLA penalties priced in. Planners approve every change.

Capabilities

Intermittent-demand models + install-base covariates Multi-echelon CP-SAT: DC → depot → consigned stock Last-time-buy planner from EOL/PCN notices ROI ledger: baseline, then measure

Outcomes

10–20%inventory freed at equal-or-better SLA (est.)
−30% / ~$700Minventory / EBIT anchor case (aircraft OEM)
1.3–1.6xaftermarket turns today — the baseline to beat
IntegratesSAP ERPDepot/WMSInstall-base telemetryEOL/PCN feeds
Built on Owllys SparesIQ foundation Workflow: Spare parts management →

Agentic sales for used, refurbished and legacy tools, where every serial is the SKU: the per-serial asset graph — configuration, attested condition grade, provenance, jurisdiction — drives export-screened quotes, refurb-delta CPQ and flash-matched trades. Rides the shipped SalesI substrate.

Capabilities

Asset Book: the trading book as a live per-serial database Messy forwarded RFQ → complete three-option quote, export-screened Refurb-delta CPQ: as-found → target spec solved and priced — LLM never numbers Used-tool export rules encoded and cited; book re-screened on a rule change Trading desk: decommission lots flash-matched to waiting buyers

Outcomes

~1 minforwarded RFQ → export-screened, three-option quote
Same dayquote book re-screened after an entity-list update, rule cited
Human-attestedcondition grades — never LLM-inferred
1 graph, 2 appsservice tickets enrich the grade that prices the next quote
IntegratesCRM / ERP (releases)RFQ email & portalsCompliance AI screeningField Service AI serial graph
Built on Owllys SalesI DIO + Tool Config CPQ foundation Workflow: Spare parts management →

Supply Chain AI

5 products

Multi-tier visibility and control, from capex tools to die banks.

For CPOs, VPs Supply Chain, logistics and materials leaders.

Monday 08:00

A ranked decision feed — exposures, predicted slips, costed mitigations; event to approved action in minutes, not weeks.

Semiconductor supply chain as a circuit board: fab, warehouse, ship, truck and air freight nodes wired to a central chip under a connected globe
supply chain ai · every tier on one circuit

Your ERP records the buy; nothing tells you the fair price. Semiconductor-native sourcing intelligence for the $0.5–3B tool program and nine hyper-concentrated commodity categories: should-cost on every quote, PO slips predicted early — cited, gated, read-first on SAP.

Capabilities

Capex & tool sourcing: slots, refurbs, service benchmarks AI expediter: commits parsed, slips predicted, chased in policy Nine commodity packs with driver-backed buy timing Should-cost models + index-linked counter-proposals

Outcomes

1–2%recovered on capex programs — $10–20M per $1B
3–8%should-cost recovery on quotes
−60–80%manual expedite workload
90 dayssavings-to-receipt proof
IntegratesSAP S/4HANA (read-first)OracleSupplier portals & email
Built on Owllys SourceNest Semiconductor foundation Workflow: Supplier onboarding →

Qualifying a second source takes 6–18 months — in categories like ABF film with one effective source. Discovery, JEDEC/AEC-Q qualification projects and risk monitoring run as durable agents, so the second source exists before the crunch.

Capabilities

Semantic discovery across registries, customs, certifications Qualification-project agent: plans, chases, scores readiness Single-source register, concentration risk per category Supplier-360: quals in flight, scorecards, field alerts

Outcomes

−30–50%qualification cycle time, from the 6–18-month norm
Rankedsingle-source chokepoints, by exposure
~90% / 5wafer supply held by five suppliers — the why
IntegratesSAP/Oracle ERPCustoms & registry dataQualification doc stores
Built on Owllys SourceNest Semiconductor foundation Workflow: Supplier onboarding →

Where should the buffer live — wafer bank, die bank or finished goods? Solved stochastically across echelons and forms, MSL and shelf-life clocks automated per lot. When supply tightens: bank die now, finish to order — gated.

Capabilities

Wafer vs die vs finished goods — solved, not guessed MSL floor-time & shelf-life clocks per lot, enforced Honest intermittent-demand forecasts for materials Shortage-mode buffer-form recommendations, gated

Outcomes

Weeks of WIPhidden interface buffer recovered
−30% / ~$700Minventory / EBIT (AI inventory benchmark)
Per lotMSL clocks tracked and enforced automatically
IntegratesSAP ERPMESSubcon EDI/RosettaNet
Built on Owllys Control Tower foundation Workflow: Spare parts management →

An entire fab arrives through customs — one missing annexure parks an etch cluster in bond. Import files assemble ICEGATE-ready, SEZ/bonded/AEO scheme logic applied, delay risk tracked per tool. The agent prepares; your licensed broker files.

Capabilities

ICEGATE-ready tool-import files per shipment SEZ / bonded / AEO scheme logic across the program ETA + delay risk per tool vs install milestones Multi-tier orchestration — prepare, never auto-file

Outcomes

On clocktool imports held to the install schedule
0auto-filings — a licensed human files
Weeksto deploy (portfolio speed rating 5/5)
IntegratesICEGATESEZ/bonded schemesCHA brokersSAP ERP
Built on Owllys TransNest foundation Workflow: Equipment installation →

Data incumbents describe parts; this acts on your BOM: price and lead-time foresight with regime detection, a live risk register per line, form-fit-function alternates always flagged “requires qualification”, counterfeit screening before any gated shortage buy.

Capabilities

Price & lead-time forecasts with honest data-density states BOM risk register: single-source, lifecycle, allocation FFF alternates — requires-qual flagged, always Counterfeit & seller-trust screening, recall-biased Agentic shortage buying within a ceiling

Outcomes

Hours, not weeksshortage response time
1–3%buy-timing savings on volatile components
Blockedcounterfeits caught before the line
IntegratesBOM/PLMLicensed market dataBroker networksERP
Built on Owllys Component Market Intelligence foundation Workflow: Supplier onboarding →

Quality & Reliability AI

4 products

From wafer-map signal to closed 8D — quality that closes the loop.

For VPs Quality & Reliability, compliance officers and customer-quality teams.

Monday 08:00

Wafer-map signatures classified overnight, 8Ds drafted and cited, the weekend’s RMAs traced to their wafer lots.

A customer escape costs days of your scarcest engineers — under sub-PPM automotive expectations. 8D, CAPA and PPAP packs are drafted straight from the root-cause evidence trail; containment-to-closure runs on state machines. Cite-or-abstain, named approvals.

Capabilities

8D / PPAP / CAPA drafted from evidence — engineers approve Containment-to-closure state machines, AEC-Q discipline Supplier-quality loop onto the scorecard Named approval gate on every customer release

Outcomes

Days → hours8D / PPAP authoring on escapes
100%claims evidence-cited in every pack
Sub-PPM / AEC-Qthe discipline the state machines enforce
IntegratesQMSMESCustomer quality portals
Built on Owllys 8D Quality Automation foundation Workflow: Root-cause investigation →

Takes a returned unit from RMA intake back through genealogy to its wafer, lot, tool and recipe; drives the FA-lab queue; classifies the mechanism; decides the highest-net-recovery disposition — and catches the epidemic cluster before it becomes a recall.

Capabilities

Field→wafer genealogy trace on the Yield AI graph — deterministic FA-lab workflow: decap → X-ray → SEM queue, committed ETAs Failure-mechanism classification, cite-or-abstain — never a guessed label Net-recovery disposition: re-screen · replace · credit · RTV · scrap Epidemic detector + gated stop-ship, precision-biased

Outcomes

−25–40%FA cycle time — the metric your customer scores you on
≥90%genealogy epidemics caught; ≤1 false stop-ship per quarter
≥85% / ≥75%mechanism-classification precision/recall ship gate
0writes to inventory or GL — recovery ledgered, gated
IntegratesCustomer AI RMA intakeYield AI genealogyQuality AI 8DSAP QM (read)
Built on Owllys ReturnNest + Yield AI genealogy foundation Workflow: Root-cause investigation →

Aggregates field-failure populations — FA results, burn-in escapes, customer DPPM trends — into calibrated FIT/Weibull models per device, package and lot-window; catches drift against the qualified AEC-Q/JEDEC baseline; routes each learning to its lever: design, process, screen or derating.

Capabilities

Deterministic FIT/DPPM/Weibull/Arrhenius fitting, confidence-bounded Drift detection vs qualified JEDEC/AEC-Q envelopes Mechanism→lever mapping: ECN, process window, screen, derating — cited Model diplomas: refuted by field data → revoked, cannot route until re-qualified Realized FIT/DPPM gains ledgered per lot-window

Outcomes

≥85% / ≥75%drift-detection precision/recall ship gate
≤1 / quarterfalse design-change triggers — an ECN is expensive
≥75%learn-backs matching the DfR team’s chosen lever
Measured“each lot makes the next one smarter” — per lot-window, on field data
IntegratesField Returns AI FA feedYield AI genealogyChange Control AI ECNJEDEC/AEC-Q baselines
Built on Owllys Field Returns exhaust + Yield AI models foundation Workflow: Engineering change →

The most trade-regulated goods on earth — entity lists +42 then +23 within a year. Classification is retrieval-first and cited; the order book re-screens the day a rule changes; declaration chases run as durable campaigns. Prepare, never auto-file.

Capabilities

Cited ECCN/HTS classification — abstains when ambiguous Rule-change replay re-screens the affected order book Denied-party & license-path screening, drafted per order Agentic declaration chase: RoHS, REACH, PFAS, 3TG Grounded BRSR/CSRD/CDP drafting — every figure cited

Outcomes

Same dayorder-book re-screen after a rule change
100%determinations cited to the governing text
0auto-filings — always prepare, never file
100%drafted report figures grounded
IntegratesSAP SD order bookBIS/Federal Register feedsDGFT/SCOMETSupplier declaration portals
Built on Owllys Trade & Export Control foundation Workflow: Supplier onboarding →

Finance & Commercial AI

4 products

The CFO’s decision layer: cost it, collect it, commit it, prove it.

For CFOs, chief supply chain officers, revenue controllers, cost accountants and FP&A leaders.

Monday 08:00

Cost-per-good-die reconciled to Friday’s close, take-or-pay re-valued, every debit adjudicated to its cited clause.

Rolls every lot’s actual cost up from the floor — material, consumables, tool-time — yield-adjusted to cost-per-good-die, NRE amortized, take-or-pay loaded. Variance decomposes as a waterfall that sums exactly; margin by product and customer, live. SAP CO stays the record.

Capabilities

Deterministic cost roll to wafer/die/unit/lot — DECIMAL, never a float Yield-adjusted cost-per-good-die, provenance cited to the yield record Plan→actual waterfall: which tool, consumable, yield loss or test-time creep Margin-by-product/customer roll-up, tied to the GL ISM/PLI incentive tracker: committed → claimed → realized

Outcomes

±2–3%lot-level reconciliation to SAP CO period-close (ship gate)
4–7%of gross profit at stake per 1% costing error at 15–25% margins
+0.5–2 ptsmargin recovered on the piloted line (est. range)
0journal postings — the controller acts in SAP CO
IntegratesSAP CO/FI/MM (read-first)MES/FDCYield AICapacity AI exposure
Built on Owllys read-first SAP CO/MES spine foundation All eight industry workflows →

Validates every invoice against its cited contract terms and runs the semiconductor claims stack — ship-and-debit, price protection, rebates, POS, consignment, OTIF/LD penalties. The Promise Ledger turns a broken promise into an adjudicated penalty, fab evidence chain attached.

Capabilities

Invoice-accuracy validation against cited contract clauses Six claim lanes, deterministic entitlement math: valid · short-pay · reject · counter Penalty adjudication on the chain: lot → promise → miss → LD clause → penalty Cash application: statement↔invoice matching, idempotent — no double-apply Collections prioritized by calibrated risk

Outcomes

4–7%of gross profit lost per point of claims leakage — the stake
≥95%straight-through cash auto-match; zero double-application
100%penalty adjudications carry the fab evidence chain
0GL postings — SAP FI posts, the payment rail moves the money
IntegratesSAP FI/SD (read-first)Delivery AI Promise LedgerDistributor POS/EDIPayment rail
Built on Owllys PayRail patterns + Delivery AI Promise Ledger foundation All eight industry workflows →

Nobody decides what to book — planning takes allocation as a given. Booked wafer, packaging and memory capacity becomes a portfolio of contracts and options: take-or-pay exposure projected into P&L, draw reconciled, ranked book/hold/release calls. You book; it never writes.

Capabilities

Take-or-pay / LTA exposure projected at every cliff, clause-cited Committed-vs-actual draw reconciliation — 100% tie-out Real-options valuation of booked slots: hold, exercise, abandon, transfer Co-book coverage: wafer ↔ CoWoS ↔ HBM gaps flagged before the cliff Prepayment & wafer-agreement tracking, milestone by milestone

Outcomes

52–156 wksbooking horizon under management — CoWoS 52–78; 2nm into 2028
$5–20Bthe commitment lumps a book/hold/release call moves
100%co-book coverage gaps flagged before the take-or-pay cliff
0writes — the CFO/CSCO books in your own contract system
IntegratesSAP (read-first)Foundry/OSAT booking portalsPlanning AI draw feedMarket Intel AI
Built on Owllys Planning AI co-booking + contract mechanics foundation All eight industry workflows →

The referee, not a player: every recommendation tracked through identified → accepted → implemented → realized — flipping only on a matched ERP signal, a PO actually paid, credited against the would-have-happened counterfactual. Modelled and realized never blur.

Capabilities

Fan-in: subscribes to every product’s recommendation events Downstream-signal matching: PO paid, fee avoided, credit posted, buffer drawn Counterfactual attribution — credit only the delta over the baseline Decay detection: modelled-but-not-realized flagged, routed back to its owner The week-8 pilot scorecard: measured value, or you walk

Outcomes

≥95%realization-match precision — a false “realized” is a lie to the CFO
±25%attribution credit vs finance’s adjudicated counterfactual
~95%of GenAI pilots show no P&L impact (MIT NANDA) — the fact this defeats
0ERP/GL writes — realized flips only on a matched fact
IntegratesSAP FI/CO/MM/SD (read-first)Every Semico suiteDemoForgi twin ledgerExecutive AI
Built on Owllys df-value counterfactual ledger (production twin) foundation All eight industry workflows →

Business AI

4 products

The decisions layer: plan it, promise it, see it — live.

For CEOs, CFOs, S&OP and customer-operations leaders.

Monday 08:00

One live picture — promises re-verified, allocations defensible, every KPI wearing an evidence badge.

Not another chart wall — a ranked feed of decisions worth money. The cross-suite spine becomes a CEO cockpit: recommendations ranked by value-at-risk × evidence, KPI tiles carrying evidence badges, a narrated “what changed this week” drilling to source records.

Capabilities

Ranked decision board: currency impact, evidence badge, owner KPI tiles with provenance — every number drills down Narrated weekly change feed across all seven suites Approval audit trail with the exact payload shown

Outcomes

Weeks → hoursexecutive decision latency
100%numbers provenance-linked to a source record
Strong / weakevidence badges on every claim — never a confidence %
IntegratesEvery Semico suiteSAP ERPMES
Built on Owllys Decision Graph foundation All eight industry workflows →

Planning in 2026 means co-booking wafer starts, CoWoS and HBM as one constraint — CoWoS booked out 52–78 weeks, HBM sold out. Demand and supply modeled against the real constraint set; shocks get costed scenarios in hours, not war rooms.

Capabilities

Wafer + CoWoS + HBM co-booked as one constraint Scenario twin: “lose 20% substrate” answered with costed options Demand/supply planning against allocated capacity Event-driven re-planning, feeding Delivery AI’s promises

Outcomes

Hoursshock re-planning vs the ~2-week norm
52–78 wksCoWoS horizon modeled, HBM co-booked
1 buywafer, packaging and memory booked together
IntegratesSAP ERPSubcon RosettaNet/EDICapacity & market feeds
Built on Owllys PlanningNest foundation All eight industry workflows →

Order management runs over EDI and RosettaNet with SAP SD as the record — nothing reasons about it. Exceptions triaged across thousands of lines, promise dates served by Delivery AI’s ATP engine, fair-share administered with audited rationale. Every write passes a named gate.

Capabilities

EDI/RosettaNet exception triage with costed resolutions Promise dates via Delivery AI’s ATP/CTP engine — calls it, never re-implements Fair-share allocation with a defensible rationale RMA triage + ship-and-debit anomaly detection

Outcomes

−40–60%exception-handling time target
0allocation audit gaps
Via Delivery AIATP/CTP promises — called, never re-implemented
IntegratesSAP SD / Oracle OMEDI/RosettaNetEmail
Built on Owllys Agentic Order Desk foundation All eight industry workflows →

A fab is a promise machine — it commits good die it hasn’t yielded yet. Four checks per promise — Available, Capable, Yielded, Profitable — logged to a Promise Ledger. It never bluffs: low confidence routes to a human.

Capabilities

Four checks at order entry: die bank, schedule, yield, margin Promise Ledger: misses auto-tune future buffers Calibrated gating: auto-confirm high, route low to a human Shadow-mode calibration before customers see a promise

Outcomes

OTIF ↑promises kept, measured on your own ledger
0silent slips — tracked to closure or escalated
Shadow-firstcalibrated before any customer sees a promise
Mo 6 > mo 1promises sharpen as the ledger learns
IntegratesSAP SDInventory AIProduction AIYield AI
Built on Owllys PromiseNest Fab foundation All eight industry workflows →
Before you deploy

Prove it before you deploy it.

Every product on this page can be rehearsed in the Digital Twin Lab, powered by DemoForgi — golden scenarios in shadow mode on a synthetic twin of your enterprise, before anything touches production.

Enter the Digital Twin Lab →