Every product is purpose-built for semiconductors and runs read-first over your ERP, MES, PLM and EDA estate — agents recommend, deterministic engines set the numbers, a named human approves every write.
0purpose-built products
0suites, one decision spine
Weeksto first value — read-first
Cite or abstainevery claim carries evidence
AI never writes to SAP or MES without a gate
Deterministic engines set the numbers
Named-human approval on every action
one substrate · seven suites · 34 dies · one tidy agent
No die on this wafer answers to “that”.
Try or — search covers product names, one-liners and suites.
agent ⬡ checked all 34 dies · twice
Engineering AI
5 products
From design intent to installed capability — without the knowledge tax.
For CTOs, VPs Engineering, fab program directors and design-ops leaders.
Monday 08:00
Reviews dispositioned and clause-cited overnight, every change’s blast radius computed — no answer trapped in a veteran’s head.
One knowledge-graph spine for fab design and construction — every tool linked to its POCs, utilities, standards, documents and decisions, with AI agents on every gate, plus release↔PO↔need-date build alignment. Read-first over your BIM/CDE estate; write-back only via named-engineer approval.
Capabilities
🧠100%-coverage design review, clause-cited (ISO 14644, SEMI S2/S8)🌊Change blast radius: 47 objects traced in 4 min🧩Clash triage: 2,412 hits → 41 root-cause issues📐Generative ballroom & sub-fab routing — weeks → hours📄36,000+ pages of tool specs → structured POC records
Outcomes
2–4 wks → 24–48 hper design-review pass, at 100% coverage
$44M–$365Mprogram value on one $10B fab (est.)
~13–70xROI vs 3-year platform cost (est.)
$50–65Mvalue of one month of earlier ramp
ModeBuild & Schedule Alignment← absorbs Fab Build AI
Extends the same graph to construction: fab-build orders long-lead packages while the design is still moving, and each month of slip carries $30–130M. Live-links engineering release ↔ PO ↔ site-need date per package and turns divergence into ranked, gated recommendations.
🔗Three-way linkage per package: release ↔ PO ↔ need date🚨5 misalignment classes, detected deterministically💰Ranked by $ exposure × critical-path float consumed🧮Bounded resequence what-ifs — “what slips if switchgear moves 3 weeks?”🧾Evidence chain: drawing rev → ECN → PO line → activity
$30–130Mcost of one month of fab-build slip — the wedge
~2 wkscritical-path float recovered per quarter — $25–65M
0writes to P6/SAP/CDE — owners execute, gates approve
Design ops runs at maturity ~2/5 even here: verification eats 60–70% of effort, EDA license spend is a black box, tapeout slips surface late. A telemetry-and-agents layer over your own exhaust — regression logs, coverage, license servers, Jira.
Capabilities
🧪Regression triage: failures clustered, root-caused, bugs drafted📈Coverage analytics + test-plan copilot🔑EDA license optimizer: idle seats and contention priced⏰Tapeout slip early-warning, while still recoverable🔍IP-reuse semantic search that actually finds things
Outcomes
60–70%the verification share of design effort this attacks
Hard dollarsEDA license spend reduced via utilization analytics
Caught earlytapeout slips flagged while recoverable
Hours returnedregression-triage engineer time — direct P&L
Standards and process windows treated as executable, not archival: recipes, SPC limits and operating states checked continuously against the current design and running fab. Simulation becomes governed evidence — every run pinned to its revision, stale results flagged.
Capabilities
📏300+ executable rules: PASS / FAIL / NEEDS-REVIEW, clause-cited🌀Operational-state simulation before certification⚙️Solver orchestration over your CFD, vibration, energy stack⚡ML surrogates answer in seconds, not days♻️Delta re-checks: a change re-triggers only affected checks
Outcomes
Seconds vs dayssurrogate estimates vs full solver runs
1–3x, not 21–78xcost of error discovery, moved left (NASA curve)
Caught at designthe at-rest-pass / operational-fail mode
Thousands of PCN/EOL notices a year, each traced by hand while 90–180-day last-time-buy windows close. Every notice is parsed and resolved against your BOM and qualification graph — blast radius across products, quals, WIP and customers, tuned for recall.
Capabilities
📨Every notice parsed to a typed schema (email, portals, aggregators)🕸️Impact traced: BOM → products → quals → WIP → customers📦Last-time-buy optimizer under demand uncertainty✉️Gated response drafts + re-qualification triggers🔄Your own ECOs trace the same graph outward
Outcomes
Days → minutesimpact analysis per change notice
0last-time-buy windows missed
→ ~0quality escapes from unmanaged change
Thousands/yrnotices absorbed without added headcount
Greenfield plants hire thousands of freshers while the answer to “bonder error E-412 on QFN-48” lives in a veteran’s head. SOPs, travelers, MES/FDC history, e-logbooks and per-serial tool docs become grounded answers — every one cited, or it abstains.
Capabilities
💬Work-instruction Q&A with citations, multilingual🌙Shift-handover drafts from MES/FDC events + e-logbook🔎Deviation assistant: likely causes from similar past NCRs🎓Operator tutor over your procedures, competence gaps tracked
Outcomes
100%answers cited or abstained — zero-hallucination gate
Weeksto deploy, read-first on documents + MES
Downoperator time-to-competence; handover completeness up
ModuleEquipment corpus← absorbs Equipment Docs AI
The same cite-or-abstain corpus, extended to the equipment estate: the versioned, permissioned document-of-record per tool model and serial — manuals, E6 specs, S2 dossiers, FAT/SAT records. It stays the citable spine that Field Service, Assembly and Commissioning read.
🗂️Per-serial document-of-record spine — linked and versioned🔀Semantic revision diffs: what changed, who it touches📤Structured SEMI E6 / S2 exports to fabs
15+ min → secper engineering search on tool docs
≥90%retrieval-precision gate — one gate, both corpora
Also integratesPLM (Teamcenter/Windchill)SEMI E6
Stays the spine Field Service, Assembly & Commissioning cite
Every lot, every tool, every shift — one live operating picture.
For COOs, VPs Manufacturing and fab & OSAT operations leadership.
Monday 08:00
WIP and OEE live per tool and shift, excursions ranked in dollars — a costed action minutes after every shock.
A fab operations command center over your MES and FDC estate: live WIP with predicted cycle times, OEE accounting, an excursion feed ranked by value-at-risk, and a scenario twin for the what-ifs. Read-first — every write passes a named-human gate.
Capabilities
📍Live WIP with ML cycle-time ETAs per route📊OEE & tool-state accounting — one state language🚨Every disruption scored in currency-at-risk, owner assigned🌪️Scenario twin: shocks re-planned with costed deltas✅Gated dispatch writes — one audited MES field
A yield excursion is a seven-figure event — one 2019 excursion scrapped $550M of wafers in a quarter. Wafer-map perception feeds a self-building genealogy graph; agentic RCA runs cross-stage over MES, FDC and STDF — ranked hypotheses, every claim cited.
Capabilities
🧬Genealogy graph built automatically — compounds with every lot🕵️Agentic RCA: ranked hypotheses with evidence trails💸Excursion feed with scrap-at-risk in dollars🚦Gated lot disposition — the only MES write, audited💬Ask it: “why did bin-7 spike?” · “draft the 8D”
Outcomes
Days → hourstime-to-root-cause on excursions
$100k–$10M+per-excursion exposure addressed
100%claims evidence-cited
90 daystypical deployment
ModeWafer-map + adaptive-test← absorbs Inspection AI
The perception layer that feeds the genealogy graph — and a cheap entry tier: a CNN names every wafer-map signature (edge ring, scratch, donut) on arrival, and DPPM-guarded adaptive test-time reduction attacks the OSAT’s #1 margin lever, MES-write-free.
🧠Wafer-map CNN signatures classified on arrival — the perception layer⏬Adaptive test-time reduction, DPPM-guarded📊Sort + final-test (STDF) analytics into the genealogy graph🔗Excursion linkage to tool & recipe
On arrivalsignatures named before a human opens the lot
OSAT margins run ~15–25% against foundry ~50%, yet thousands of package × test combinations are scheduled on Excel. A CP-SAT solver keeps a live horizon schedule; a sub-second dispatcher recommends the next lot. The planner approves; MES stays the record.
Capabilities
🧮CP-SAT horizon solve on every WIP or tool event⚡Sub-second next-lot-on-tool dispatch🔥Hot-lot handling with ripple-cost analysis🛡️Hard guards: MSL clocks, due dates, tool capability🤚Honest abstains on stale live state
Calendar-based PM guards tools worth $5M–$380M each. FDC and sensor streams feed anomaly detection and remaining-useful-life estimates per failure mode — every alert an explicit economic decision, with the work order gated into SAP-PM.
Capabilities
📡Anomaly + RUL per critical subsystem, failure mode named⚖️Explicit economics: run-to-failure vs planned swap📝Predictive work orders gated into SAP-PM/CMMS🧰Technician copilot — never invents a torque spec
Outcomes
−30–50%unplanned downtime (industry benchmark)
$5M–$380Mtool value idled per stockout — the stake
The full tool lifecycle — build, quote, install, service, resupply, trade.
For equipment OEM manufacturing, quoting, service, aftermarket and install leaders — fab equipment engineering, and the legacy-tool secondary market.
Monday 08:00
Fleet uptime vs the SLA floor, build promises vs factory reality, leakage found — every number drills to a ticket, PO or serial.
equipment ai · build → install → service → resupply
Services run 22–35% of revenue at OEMs on tribal knowledge. Every ticket is triaged for remote resolution before a truck rolls; engineers get page-cited troubleshooting — plus an offline Engineer / 2 a.m. mode for legacy tools the OEM abandoned; every event is audited against entitlements.
Capabilities
🛰️Remote-first triage before the flight is booked📖Page-cited troubleshooting from manuals + closed tickets🧳Dispatch prep: right skill, right parts kit🧾Entitlement audit: free work and warranty misuse flagged
Outcomes
+50%first-contact resolution (industry benchmark)
30 min → <1 mintroubleshooting time per incident
~1 in 3tickets remotely resolvable — rolled anyway today
Per resolutionbilling — our revenue is your deflection rate
ModeEngineer / 2 a.m.Runner-ready← absorbs Engineer AI
Troubleshooting for legacy tools the OEM abandoned: speak or photograph the symptom at the tool — offline — and get ranked fix cards cited to the page (the 1998 manual, this serial’s last three fixes). Runs on the shipped EquipAI substrate.
🎙️Voice/photo symptom intake — offline-capable at the tool📖Ranked fix cards, page-cited to scanned manuals + this serial’s history🗄️Legacy / OEM-abandoned-tool corpus, scanned pre-2005 manuals OCR’d🔄Per-tenant knowledge flywheel: a veteran’s fix captured, curated, re-cited — never pooled🧩Discontinued-part answers: alternates, repair or new-manufacture, priced (hands to Sales AI)🧾Refurb-warranty entitlement leakage flagged, billable line drafted💵Per-verified-fix billing — a fix-verification gate meters revenue
symptom → <60 svoice/photo intake to a page-cited fix card
Per-tenantknowledge corpus, never pooled — your veterans stay your moat
Remote health, predictive maintenance and a per-serial digital twin for the installed base. Five connectivity tiers feed drift baselines and RUL models; anomalies arrive as one approvable package. Raw telemetry never leaves the fab’s data boundary.
Capabilities
🪜Five-tier connectivity: SECS/GEM → retrofit IoT📊SEMI E10/E79 state & OEE per serial📦Anomaly → cause, parts kit, dispatch, SLA — one approval object👥Per-serial twin + drift clustering across the fleet💬Fleet Q&A with citations
Outcomes
−30–50%unplanned downtime (industry benchmark)
+20–40%machine life
3–4 hoursunplanned downtime saved per planned hour
0competing installed-base twins for sale (verified Jul 2026)
First-pass yield on complex tool assemblies runs 85–90% — rework on machines priced $5M–$380M, while new-site ramps repeat the veterans’ apprenticeship. The traveler for a serial + configuration becomes interactive, cited, vision-verified steps at the clean bench.
Capabilities
🗂️Step cards per serial + config: action, spec values, citation chip👁️Vision step-verify: fasteners, orientation, FOD, weld class🚧Two-tap deviation → NCR draft + SME escalation🔄BKM flywheel: floor fixes curated into the corpus🧵Serial Build Record feeds FAT baselines and the tool twin
Outcomes
+2–5 ptsfirst-pass yield from the 85–90% baseline, measured
−30–50%time-to-solo for new technicians
100%steps cited — ships only after a ≥90% retrieval gate
SemAi schedules the fab — Tool Build AI schedules the people who build the tools. CP-SAT finite-capacity scheduling of engineer-to-order builds across clean bays, test stands and skill-certified crews, headless on your SAP: the solver proposes, the master scheduler publishes.
Capabilities
🧮CP-SAT master schedule over bays × test stands × crew skills🎟️Build-slot promising: capable-to-promise ship dates, confidence-banded🚨Recovery re-plans on a part or bay slip, ranked by promise-date delta🛂Crew certification + export clearance as hard solver constraints📊Test-floor OEE analytics on 5-tier retrofit sensing
Outcomes
+2–5 ptsbay/test-stand OEE from the ~65–75% baseline (est.)
$5M–380Mthe shipment a recovered bay-week pulls forward
Every configured-tool quote is an engineering exercise run from experts’ heads — and in a supercycle, quote latency is lost share. A CP-SAT rulebase decides validity, a deterministic engine prices the quote-to-BOM; the LLM drafts the narrative, never the numbers.
Capabilities
🧩Option-compatibility rulebase — verdicts cited to the violated rule🧾Quote-to-BOM integrity: valid config → priced BOM + margin/lead-time roll-up🛂Export/ECCN pre-check per destination — calls Compliance AI, never rebuilds it🎯Retrofit Radar: upgrade campaigns targeted by serial, not broadcast🔁An ECO ripple invalidates affected open quotes automatically
Outcomes
Weeks → daysquote latency on complex configurations (est.)
21–78xinstall-stage cost of the config errors this prevents
A fab installs ~1,200 tools from 100+ vendors; hook-up alone runs $200–500k per tool. Every order becomes one live thread — build → FAT → ship → hook-up → SAT → SL1–SL3 — with slip propagation and self-assembling dossiers.
Capabilities
🧵One live thread from clean-bay build to SL sign-off⏱️Slip propagation with ranked recovery options🛂Crew booking on skills + export-control constraints📚SL1–SL3 / SEMI S2 dossiers assemble themselves
Outcomes
≈ $12–16Mvalue of one avoided slip week (est.)
21–78xcost of an install-stage error vs design stage
Service-parts demand is intermittent and install-base-driven — the canonical hard forecasting problem, run today on ERP min/max. Forecasts come from fleet age, utilization and PM waves; the whole echelon is optimized with SLA penalties priced in. Planners approve every change.
Capabilities
📈Intermittent-demand models + install-base covariates🏭Multi-echelon CP-SAT: DC → depot → consigned stock📦Last-time-buy planner from EOL/PCN notices🧾ROI ledger: baseline, then measure
Outcomes
10–20%inventory freed at equal-or-better SLA (est.)
−30% / ~$700Minventory / EBIT anchor case (aircraft OEM)
1.3–1.6xaftermarket turns today — the baseline to beat
Agentic sales for used, refurbished and legacy tools, where every serial is the SKU: the per-serial asset graph — configuration, attested condition grade, provenance, jurisdiction — drives export-screened quotes, refurb-delta CPQ and flash-matched trades. Rides the shipped SalesI substrate.
Capabilities
🏷️Asset Book: the trading book as a live per-serial database📨Messy forwarded RFQ → complete three-option quote, export-screened🧮Refurb-delta CPQ: as-found → target spec solved and priced — LLM never numbers⚖️Used-tool export rules encoded and cited; book re-screened on a rule change⚡Trading desk: decommission lots flash-matched to waiting buyers
Multi-tier visibility and control, from capex tools to die banks.
For CPOs, VPs Supply Chain, logistics and materials leaders.
Monday 08:00
A ranked decision feed — exposures, predicted slips, costed mitigations; event to approved action in minutes, not weeks.
supply chain ai · every tier on one circuit
Your ERP records the buy; nothing tells you the fair price. Semiconductor-native sourcing intelligence for the $0.5–3B tool program and nine hyper-concentrated commodity categories: should-cost on every quote, PO slips predicted early — cited, gated, read-first on SAP.
Capabilities
🔧Capex & tool sourcing: slots, refurbs, service benchmarks🕵️AI expediter: commits parsed, slips predicted, chased in policy📡Nine commodity packs with driver-backed buy timing🧮Should-cost models + index-linked counter-proposals
Qualifying a second source takes 6–18 months — in categories like ABF film with one effective source. Discovery, JEDEC/AEC-Q qualification projects and risk monitoring run as durable agents, so the second source exists before the crunch.
Capabilities
🔎Semantic discovery across registries, customs, certifications📋Qualification-project agent: plans, chases, scores readiness⚠️Single-source register, concentration risk per category🤝Supplier-360: quals in flight, scorecards, field alerts
Outcomes
−30–50%qualification cycle time, from the 6–18-month norm
Rankedsingle-source chokepoints, by exposure
~90% / 5wafer supply held by five suppliers — the why
Where should the buffer live — wafer bank, die bank or finished goods? Solved stochastically across echelons and forms, MSL and shelf-life clocks automated per lot. When supply tightens: bank die now, finish to order — gated.
Capabilities
🏦Wafer vs die vs finished goods — solved, not guessed⏲️MSL floor-time & shelf-life clocks per lot, enforced📈Honest intermittent-demand forecasts for materials🌊Shortage-mode buffer-form recommendations, gated
An entire fab arrives through customs — one missing annexure parks an etch cluster in bond. Import files assemble ICEGATE-ready, SEZ/bonded/AEO scheme logic applied, delay risk tracked per tool. The agent prepares; your licensed broker files.
Capabilities
🛃ICEGATE-ready tool-import files per shipment🏝️SEZ / bonded / AEO scheme logic across the program⏱️ETA + delay risk per tool vs install milestones🚢Multi-tier orchestration — prepare, never auto-file
Data incumbents describe parts; this acts on your BOM: price and lead-time foresight with regime detection, a live risk register per line, form-fit-function alternates always flagged “requires qualification”, counterfeit screening before any gated shortage buy.
Capabilities
📈Price & lead-time forecasts with honest data-density states⚠️BOM risk register: single-source, lifecycle, allocation🔁FFF alternates — requires-qual flagged, always🕵️Counterfeit & seller-trust screening, recall-biased🤖Agentic shortage buying within a ceiling
From wafer-map signal to closed 8D — quality that closes the loop.
For VPs Quality & Reliability, compliance officers and customer-quality teams.
Monday 08:00
Wafer-map signatures classified overnight, 8Ds drafted and cited, the weekend’s RMAs traced to their wafer lots.
A customer escape costs days of your scarcest engineers — under sub-PPM automotive expectations. 8D, CAPA and PPAP packs are drafted straight from the root-cause evidence trail; containment-to-closure runs on state machines. Cite-or-abstain, named approvals.
Capabilities
📝8D / PPAP / CAPA drafted from evidence — engineers approve🔒Containment-to-closure state machines, AEC-Q discipline🔗Supplier-quality loop onto the scorecard✅Named approval gate on every customer release
Outcomes
Days → hours8D / PPAP authoring on escapes
100%claims evidence-cited in every pack
Sub-PPM / AEC-Qthe discipline the state machines enforce
Takes a returned unit from RMA intake back through genealogy to its wafer, lot, tool and recipe; drives the FA-lab queue; classifies the mechanism; decides the highest-net-recovery disposition — and catches the epidemic cluster before it becomes a recall.
Capabilities
🧬Field→wafer genealogy trace on the Yield AI graph — deterministic🔬FA-lab workflow: decap → X-ray → SEM queue, committed ETAs🏷️Failure-mechanism classification, cite-or-abstain — never a guessed label⚖️Net-recovery disposition: re-screen · replace · credit · RTV · scrap🚨Epidemic detector + gated stop-ship, precision-biased
Outcomes
−25–40%FA cycle time — the metric your customer scores you on
≥90%genealogy epidemics caught; ≤1 false stop-ship per quarter
Aggregates field-failure populations — FA results, burn-in escapes, customer DPPM trends — into calibrated FIT/Weibull models per device, package and lot-window; catches drift against the qualified AEC-Q/JEDEC baseline; routes each learning to its lever: design, process, screen or derating.
Capabilities
📈Deterministic FIT/DPPM/Weibull/Arrhenius fitting, confidence-bounded🚨Drift detection vs qualified JEDEC/AEC-Q envelopes🧭Mechanism→lever mapping: ECN, process window, screen, derating — cited🎓Model diplomas: refuted by field data → revoked, cannot route until re-qualified📒Realized FIT/DPPM gains ledgered per lot-window
The most trade-regulated goods on earth — entity lists +42 then +23 within a year. Classification is retrieval-first and cited; the order book re-screens the day a rule changes; declaration chases run as durable campaigns. Prepare, never auto-file.
Capabilities
📜Cited ECCN/HTS classification — abstains when ambiguous🔁Rule-change replay re-screens the affected order book🚫Denied-party & license-path screening, drafted per order📮Agentic declaration chase: RoHS, REACH, PFAS, 3TG🌱Grounded BRSR/CSRD/CDP drafting — every figure cited
Outcomes
Same dayorder-book re-screen after a rule change
100%determinations cited to the governing text
0auto-filings — always prepare, never file
100%drafted report figures grounded
IntegratesSAP SD order bookBIS/Federal Register feedsDGFT/SCOMETSupplier declaration portals
The CFO’s decision layer: cost it, collect it, commit it, prove it.
For CFOs, chief supply chain officers, revenue controllers, cost accountants and FP&A leaders.
Monday 08:00
Cost-per-good-die reconciled to Friday’s close, take-or-pay re-valued, every debit adjudicated to its cited clause.
Rolls every lot’s actual cost up from the floor — material, consumables, tool-time — yield-adjusted to cost-per-good-die, NRE amortized, take-or-pay loaded. Variance decomposes as a waterfall that sums exactly; margin by product and customer, live. SAP CO stays the record.
Capabilities
🧮Deterministic cost roll to wafer/die/unit/lot — DECIMAL, never a float🎯Yield-adjusted cost-per-good-die, provenance cited to the yield record📉Plan→actual waterfall: which tool, consumable, yield loss or test-time creep📊Margin-by-product/customer roll-up, tied to the GL🏛️ISM/PLI incentive tracker: committed → claimed → realized
Outcomes
±2–3%lot-level reconciliation to SAP CO period-close (ship gate)
4–7%of gross profit at stake per 1% costing error at 15–25% margins
+0.5–2 ptsmargin recovered on the piloted line (est. range)
0journal postings — the controller acts in SAP CO
IntegratesSAP CO/FI/MM (read-first)MES/FDCYield AICapacity AI exposure
Validates every invoice against its cited contract terms and runs the semiconductor claims stack — ship-and-debit, price protection, rebates, POS, consignment, OTIF/LD penalties. The Promise Ledger turns a broken promise into an adjudicated penalty, fab evidence chain attached.
Capabilities
🧾Invoice-accuracy validation against cited contract clauses🧮Six claim lanes, deterministic entitlement math: valid · short-pay · reject · counter📬Penalty adjudication on the chain: lot → promise → miss → LD clause → penalty💳Cash application: statement↔invoice matching, idempotent — no double-apply📊Collections prioritized by calibrated risk
Outcomes
4–7%of gross profit lost per point of claims leakage — the stake
≥95%straight-through cash auto-match; zero double-application
100%penalty adjudications carry the fab evidence chain
0GL postings — SAP FI posts, the payment rail moves the money
IntegratesSAP FI/SD (read-first)Delivery AI Promise LedgerDistributor POS/EDIPayment rail
Nobody decides what to book — planning takes allocation as a given. Booked wafer, packaging and memory capacity becomes a portfolio of contracts and options: take-or-pay exposure projected into P&L, draw reconciled, ranked book/hold/release calls. You book; it never writes.
Capabilities
🧾Take-or-pay / LTA exposure projected at every cliff, clause-cited🔄Committed-vs-actual draw reconciliation — 100% tie-out🎟️Real-options valuation of booked slots: hold, exercise, abandon, transfer🧩Co-book coverage: wafer ↔ CoWoS ↔ HBM gaps flagged before the cliff💰Prepayment & wafer-agreement tracking, milestone by milestone
Outcomes
52–156 wksbooking horizon under management — CoWoS 52–78; 2nm into 2028
$5–20Bthe commitment lumps a book/hold/release call moves
100%co-book coverage gaps flagged before the take-or-pay cliff
0writes — the CFO/CSCO books in your own contract system
IntegratesSAP (read-first)Foundry/OSAT booking portalsPlanning AI draw feedMarket Intel AI
The referee, not a player: every recommendation tracked through identified → accepted → implemented → realized — flipping only on a matched ERP signal, a PO actually paid, credited against the would-have-happened counterfactual. Modelled and realized never blur.
Capabilities
🔀Fan-in: subscribes to every product’s recommendation events🔎Downstream-signal matching: PO paid, fee avoided, credit posted, buffer drawn⚖️Counterfactual attribution — credit only the delta over the baseline⏳Decay detection: modelled-but-not-realized flagged, routed back to its owner📊The week-8 pilot scorecard: measured value, or you walk
Outcomes
≥95%realization-match precision — a false “realized” is a lie to the CFO
±25%attribution credit vs finance’s adjudicated counterfactual
~95%of GenAI pilots show no P&L impact (MIT NANDA) — the fact this defeats
0ERP/GL writes — realized flips only on a matched fact
IntegratesSAP FI/CO/MM/SD (read-first)Every Semico suiteDemoForgi twin ledgerExecutive AI
The decisions layer: plan it, promise it, see it — live.
For CEOs, CFOs, S&OP and customer-operations leaders.
Monday 08:00
One live picture — promises re-verified, allocations defensible, every KPI wearing an evidence badge.
Not another chart wall — a ranked feed of decisions worth money. The cross-suite spine becomes a CEO cockpit: recommendations ranked by value-at-risk × evidence, KPI tiles carrying evidence badges, a narrated “what changed this week” drilling to source records.
Capabilities
🎯Ranked decision board: currency impact, evidence badge, owner🏷️KPI tiles with provenance — every number drills down🗞️Narrated weekly change feed across all seven suites🧾Approval audit trail with the exact payload shown
Outcomes
Weeks → hoursexecutive decision latency
100%numbers provenance-linked to a source record
Strong / weakevidence badges on every claim — never a confidence %
Planning in 2026 means co-booking wafer starts, CoWoS and HBM as one constraint — CoWoS booked out 52–78 weeks, HBM sold out. Demand and supply modeled against the real constraint set; shocks get costed scenarios in hours, not war rooms.
Capabilities
🧩Wafer + CoWoS + HBM co-booked as one constraint🌪️Scenario twin: “lose 20% substrate” answered with costed options📅Demand/supply planning against allocated capacity🔄Event-driven re-planning, feeding Delivery AI’s promises
Order management runs over EDI and RosettaNet with SAP SD as the record — nothing reasons about it. Exceptions triaged across thousands of lines, promise dates served by Delivery AI’s ATP engine, fair-share administered with audited rationale. Every write passes a named gate.
Capabilities
📥EDI/RosettaNet exception triage with costed resolutions📆Promise dates via Delivery AI’s ATP/CTP engine — calls it, never re-implements⚖️Fair-share allocation with a defensible rationale🔁RMA triage + ship-and-debit anomaly detection
Outcomes
−40–60%exception-handling time target
0allocation audit gaps
Via Delivery AIATP/CTP promises — called, never re-implemented
A fab is a promise machine — it commits good die it hasn’t yielded yet. Four checks per promise — Available, Capable, Yielded, Profitable — logged to a Promise Ledger. It never bluffs: low confidence routes to a human.
Capabilities
✅Four checks at order entry: die bank, schedule, yield, margin📒Promise Ledger: misses auto-tune future buffers🎚️Calibrated gating: auto-confirm high, route low to a human🕶️Shadow-mode calibration before customers see a promise
Outcomes
OTIF ↑promises kept, measured on your own ledger
0silent slips — tracked to closure or escalated
Shadow-firstcalibrated before any customer sees a promise
Every product on this page can be rehearsed in the Digital Twin Lab, powered by DemoForgi — golden scenarios in shadow mode on a synthetic twin of your enterprise, before anything touches production.